chabouk wrote:Have you ever been forced to go somewhere that is 30.06 posted? If not, why do you think you have a right to be on that property at all?Embalmo wrote:Guys,
I disagree with businesses legally having 30.06, profusely. My right to defend myself is imposed upon when a 30.06 sign is posted
You mean like the state prison where the recent escapee (allegedly) had a gun smuggled in?Now if there were a way to really keep bad guys from carrying, like LEOs and medal detectors, then it would be a debate that we're not having at the present...
You beat me to the punch on this one. This has always been my argument on the smoking ban (im not a smoker by the way). But my question is this, why should the city (Houston) have the right to stop any restaurant from allowing smoking? If you are a non-smoker, you dont have to eat at that particular establishment. Same in this case. You may not like the 30.06 rule, but you dont have to eat or shop there either.