That's true, and witnesses reported that those killed were hit multiple times COM. I imagine you'd see pretty much the same results regardless of caliber.Lumberjack98 wrote:If you shot 43 people in the arm or leg with a 45, how many do you think would survive? Probably all of them. Shot placement is key. I don't know where the survivors were shot on their body, but I'd bet that most of them were not hit COM or in the head.chabouk wrote:Really? He shot 43 people,and 30 of them survived. That doesn't sound like a super deadly round to me.
Search found 2 matches
- Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:59 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: 5.7 Effectiveness
- Replies: 15
- Views: 2251
Re: 5.7 Effectiveness
- Sun Nov 15, 2009 3:27 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: 5.7 Effectiveness
- Replies: 15
- Views: 2251
Re: 5.7 Effectiveness
Really? He shot 43 people,and 30 of them survived. That doesn't sound like a super deadly round to me.stroo wrote:I read a article on the FNH 5.7 in a gun magazine today. It mentioned that there was a lot of controversy over the effectiveness of the round because there had not been very many real life shootings with the round. I would imagine that Major Hasan just put an end to the arguments. I would say the 5.7 is an effective round.