Search found 3 matches

by chabouk
Sat Oct 31, 2009 8:58 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: National Guard Base
Replies: 26
Views: 4684

Re: National Guard Base

bburgi wrote:There are Federal and State funds at work simultaneously within the National Guard. You're right in staying there could be a difference depending on who owns the property, the thing is almost all National Guard property is owned by the state.
For the purposes of 18 USC 930, it doesn't matter who owns it. When a packing plant provides an office for the USDA inspectors, that office is a "federal facility". Even if Texas owns the land and building, if the technician and administrator are DoD Civilians, then the buildings where they work are "federal facilities".
by chabouk
Thu Oct 29, 2009 10:49 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: National Guard Base
Replies: 26
Views: 4684

Re: National Guard Base

bburgi wrote:Just to clarify here... (since I'm in the Guard full time and work at Camp Mabry...)
By "full time", I assume you mean AGR?

Where does your paycheck come from? If it's DoD instead of Texas, then any building you regularly perform work in is a "federal facility" under the definition of 18 USC 930. See my earlier comments about a friend in Arkansas who is an O4 on the weekends, but a GS11 weekdays as his unit's administrative officer.
by chabouk
Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:36 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: National Guard Base
Replies: 26
Views: 4684

Re: National Guard Base

No matter who owns the armory, it is a "federal facility" under 18 USC 930, because federal employees regularly work there. The administrator and clerk are DoD civilian employees on a GS scale.

I have a friend who is a major in the Arkansas NG, and is also the unit administrative officer. On the weekends when he flies his NG helicopter, he's an O-4, and during the week when he's the administrator he's a GS-11.

Return to “National Guard Base”