TexasCHLforum.com

http://www.myfoxdc.com/story/22710662/u ... z2XWbSXhyE" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Creating babies with dna from 3 people.

Cedar Park Dad wrote:If your brother dies, you're supposed to marry his wife too.

That's what I remember.

We are starting down a slippery slope.

sarcasm on/ Why is the age of consent so high? Shouldn't "marriage" be allowed once puberty has been reached, isn't that what nature intended. sarcasm off/

Cedar Park Dad wrote:

TxA wrote:

sunny beach wrote:Polygamy has a long tradition in Human history. It also appears in The Bible, and not in a negative light. So whether we're arguing from a secular or religious basis, there's a much better argument to allow polygamy than there is to sanction same sex marriage.

Hmmm...I think you might want to review the text. While polygamy has a long tradition in human history as you state and was common in antiquity and described in the Old Testament, the practice was never condoned and actually specifically condemned. The text never shies away from people’s warts and misgivings but displays them as they were.

Was common? It still is common in much of the world, and approved by the largest religion on the globe. I don't think its sane as having one is too much work for me, but I don't have to do it either.

If I am not mistaken polygamy is required in certain circumstances in the Old Testament.

http://washingtonexaminer.com/obama-i-w ... le/2532418" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Obama won't make churches conduct gay marriages. How benevolent of him. But will our next king or queen feel the same?

I really don't care about Gays one way or the other. They are people and should have rights like anyone else.

I don't think however, the government should be in the business of marrying people.

Let churches do the marrying.

Let governments decide on partnerships.

To me the government should issue domestic partnership licenses. Please don't call it marriage. I am offended for the government to do that.