TexasCHLforum.com

texag06 wrote:Bobcat:
I don't know any CHL holders like that personally. However, in my CHL class, there were several older (70+) guys in there for renewal that admitted they had not shot since their last renewal class. SCARY!

There was a couple of renewers in our class that fessed up to not shooting since there last renewal. It did strike me as odd.

txinvestigator wrote:

Diode wrote:What a couple of dipsticks, that's some insane logic. ( Jim gets on his soap box)

For 1 thing even if I miss 90% of my shots I will still get 1 or 2 of my 11 rounds of .40acp into the target! Still better odds than standing there unarmed waiting for officer negitive to save me. (No disrespect to al lthe good LEO's)

and where do your 8 other shots go? Into me or my family? How about you practice more and get better. [/b]

Sorry TX, I wasn't planning on flinging 8 wild one out there. Only making the point if under extreme pressure or suprise, I would still be better off hitting my target 10% of the time rather than being unarmed. Like most of the people in here, we read, listen and learn form you guys who have been doing this a while. I also pratice weekly at the range and God willing someday taking some classes. I do understand your point!

What a couple of dipsticks, that's some insane logic. ( Jim gets on his soap box)

For 1 thing even if I miss 90% of my shots I will still get 1 or 2 of my 11 rounds of .40acp into the target! Still better odds than standing there unarmed waiting for officer negitive to save me. (No disrespect to al lthe good LEO's)

Second, I still pratice more than the bag guys so I still stand a better chance against a would be robber, mugger, hijacker..... etc.

Third, Every LEO I have met thinks armed citizens can do nothing but good.
(Jim gets off soap box)

I had an instructor I won't go back to in 5 years. I'll find me a new one.