The Annoyed Man,
My original question was, "Would you undergo additional training if it meant you could carry concealed anywhere without restriction?"
Embalmo
Search found 5 matches
Return to “Would you go through more CHL training?”
- Fri Dec 11, 2009 1:17 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Would you go through more CHL training?
- Replies: 55
- Views: 7869
- Thu Dec 10, 2009 10:07 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Would you go through more CHL training?
- Replies: 55
- Views: 7869
Re: Would you go through more CHL training?
Good comparison-Last I checked, Jesus was restricted in the same places as guns (schools, federal buildings).lil red wrote:My question is: Would you guys go through more training, and even possibly as much as a priest's religious training if it meant being able to believe in God everywhere, and if it would make anti-religious shut up?
Embalmo
- Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:37 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Would you go through more CHL training?
- Replies: 55
- Views: 7869
Re: Would you go through more CHL training?
Guys,
Okay I'm confused-I assumed that all CHLs would be against restricted carry, but this is the second thread here that I've had to defend it. Am I strange because I believe in defending myself/family 100% of the time, or am I just missing something?
If someone is going to argue the "It's their business they can do what they want" card, then why can't they discriminate based on race, sex, or handicap-no one forced any of them to enter the building; so why would it be such a stretch to require businesses to be required to respect the individual's right to self preservation?
It's not a big deal now because there are very few legal 30.06 signs, but what happens when insurance companies start requiring them and a 30.06 sign becomes the rule instead of the exception.
Embalmo
Okay I'm confused-I assumed that all CHLs would be against restricted carry, but this is the second thread here that I've had to defend it. Am I strange because I believe in defending myself/family 100% of the time, or am I just missing something?
If someone is going to argue the "It's their business they can do what they want" card, then why can't they discriminate based on race, sex, or handicap-no one forced any of them to enter the building; so why would it be such a stretch to require businesses to be required to respect the individual's right to self preservation?
It's not a big deal now because there are very few legal 30.06 signs, but what happens when insurance companies start requiring them and a 30.06 sign becomes the rule instead of the exception.
Embalmo
- Thu Dec 10, 2009 2:07 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Would you go through more CHL training?
- Replies: 55
- Views: 7869
Re: Would you go through more CHL training?
Guys,
I disagree with businesses legally having 30.06, profusely. My right to defend myself is imposed upon when a 30.06 sign is posted; I would compare it to not being allowed to carry my rescue inhaler, hearts meds, or insulin (all I really need is the inhaler, but you get the point). Now if there were a way to really keep bad guys from carrying, like LEOs and medal detectors, then it would be a debate that we're not having at the present; I disagree with my rights being infringed upon so some people can play pretend fantasy games. I'm sure there's a high percentage of the 30.06 posters who would love to include LEOs in the ban, and would disband the U.S. military, but since they legally cannot, does that mean their rights are being infringed upon?
Embalmo
I disagree with businesses legally having 30.06, profusely. My right to defend myself is imposed upon when a 30.06 sign is posted; I would compare it to not being allowed to carry my rescue inhaler, hearts meds, or insulin (all I really need is the inhaler, but you get the point). Now if there were a way to really keep bad guys from carrying, like LEOs and medal detectors, then it would be a debate that we're not having at the present; I disagree with my rights being infringed upon so some people can play pretend fantasy games. I'm sure there's a high percentage of the 30.06 posters who would love to include LEOs in the ban, and would disband the U.S. military, but since they legally cannot, does that mean their rights are being infringed upon?
Embalmo
- Thu Dec 10, 2009 1:11 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Would you go through more CHL training?
- Replies: 55
- Views: 7869
Would you go through more CHL training?
Guys,
When I deal with people who make ridiculous arguments against campus carry, ect., like, "People will just start shooting each other, over grades," I often ask them why they are fine with police officers carrying because we actually go through the same, if not more more stringent criminal background screening process.
My question is: Would you guys go through more training, and even possibly as much as LEO gun training if it meant being able to carry everywhere, and if it would make anti-gunners shut up? I certainly would, if, and only if the price of the licensure didn't increase.
Embalmo
When I deal with people who make ridiculous arguments against campus carry, ect., like, "People will just start shooting each other, over grades," I often ask them why they are fine with police officers carrying because we actually go through the same, if not more more stringent criminal background screening process.
My question is: Would you guys go through more training, and even possibly as much as LEO gun training if it meant being able to carry everywhere, and if it would make anti-gunners shut up? I certainly would, if, and only if the price of the licensure didn't increase.
Embalmo