Charles L. Cotton wrote:rotor wrote:Isn't this somewhat like making a store liable if they post a 30.06 and you are injured by a BG while you are unarmed in the store? Perhaps a precedence setter for Texas.
Good idea, but it won't work. State law requires kids to go to school, so imposing strict liability on schools is warranted. No one is required by law to enter any business establishment.
Chas.
I don't know! I feel legally obligated to take my grand kids to Baskin-Robbins when I see them.
I always need a double scoop of Chocolate Almond myself as well.