A routine traffic stop without evidence of criminal activity is not justification for any search, period! IMHO, IANALAlf wrote:His insurance lapsed. Or maybe there was an error in their computer system. That's all the probable cause he needs to assume the car and anything inside is stolen.OldCannon wrote:Wait, I don't get this: What reasonable cause does he have to think your guns are stolen? Without his statement of probable cause, I doubt I would consent to that search.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Williamson County :(”
- Sun Apr 01, 2012 1:49 pm
- Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
- Topic: Williamson County :(
- Replies: 62
- Views: 15850
Re: Williamson County :(
- Sun Apr 01, 2012 11:30 am
- Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
- Topic: Williamson County :(
- Replies: 62
- Views: 15850
Re: Williamson County :(
I didn't know what is was called but the officers I have encountered have all said it is usually not up to date. Once when a woman slammed into my daughter, a guy that sideswiped my brother's Bronco when I was with him and once on my truck when a man came into my lane form the opposite way and knocked my mirror off. They all to a man said the insurance check was almost worthless. That was within the last year and a half. The system said the woman had insurance but she didn't. Maybe it's better now, huh, mreavisAFCop wrote:Actually, from a TLETS terminal (slightly better then a MDC) TLETS will tell you if insurance status is confirmed or if you need to manually verify. It is not a flawless system and can be outdated by a couple months. Furthermore, I am not sure if that would be a valid traffic stop, considering the system doesn't say expired or not, merely confirmed or manually verify.