I pulled up information from a law firm to make my post about the federal judge's decision on 18-20 year old carry (I'll try to find it again). The state stated it would not appeal, so the ruling more or less nullifies the legal restrictions for lack of a better term. Someone who speaks legalese may chime in with a better explanation or legal term for it.Rafe wrote: ↑Tue Jan 02, 2024 2:47 pmI'm thoroughly confused. Which means I'm starting off 2024 just like I ended 2023.puma guy wrote: ↑Tue Jan 02, 2024 10:15 amI don't know whether it's a requirement for 18-20 year olds to open carry, but I know a federal judge ruled Texas law prohibiting them from open carrying without an LTC to be unconstitutional. The open carry law requires a belt holster or shoulder holster AFAIK.The Annoyed Man wrote: ↑Tue Jan 02, 2024 9:52 am As to whether or not 18-20yr olds can lawfully carry in Texas, I have fingerprinted a number of them for their LTCs, and one was open carrying sans license when I fingerprinted him. My understanding is that 18-20yr olds carrying without a license must open carry. Does that sound right?
On a related subject, some months ago I fingerprinted an assistant prosecutor for Dallas County, who told me that they had successfully prosecuted several otherwise law-abiding adult citizens for carrying in a non-prescribed manner without a license. I don’t know if it’s true or not…and I honestly don’t care…but he said that permitless carry required the use of either a belt holster or a shoulder holster, and the accused in these cases were not using either when they got popped.
I need to review the law to see what it says.![]()
In the Penal Code only mention of a shoulder or belt holster comes in Section 46.15 "Nonapplicability" (r)(1), which applies specifically to first responders. Though I have to admit that the current display of the statutes (https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs ... /PE.46.htm) is a bit convoluted to understand because we have entire subsections shown that were effective through December 31, 2023, and subsequent sections that took effect as of yesterday. Makes it hard to match up what is current and what isn't.
Does anybody know where we'll eventually be able to get current Penal and Government Codes without all the "added by," "amended by," "redesignated from," and "repealed by" stuff?
"Holster" is not specifically defined in PC 46, PC 30, or in GC 411.
PC 46.02 seems to indicate to me that Constitutional carry (meaning no license) is not an option for anyone under 21 years of age unless on their own premises, inside or en route to/from their vehicle or watercraft (and inside the vehicle the handgun, if in plain view, must be carried in a holster of some sort and the person must have an LTC). That would be 46.02(3)(B)(a-1)(1) which includes: "A person commits an offense if the person intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly carries on or about his or her person a handgun in a motor vehicle or watercraft that is owned by the person or under the person's control at any time in which the handgun is in plain view, unless the person is 21 years of age or older or is licensed to carry a handgun under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, and the handgun is carried in a holster..."
I've already gone cross-eyed from trying to piece together all the "amended by" and "repealed by" modifications.Can someone point me to relevant statute(s) that say unlicensed, Constitutional carry includes 18 to 20 year olds?
Edited to add: Found a Texas Tribune article from August 2022 that looks like it's about the challenge to the 18-20 issue: https://www.texastribune.org/2022/08/25 ... -handguns/. A PDF of the entire ruling from August 25, 2002 is here: https://static.texastribune.org/media/f ... McCraw.pdf.
The ruling was in favor of the plaintiffs, however the injunction was stayed "for thirty days, or pending appeal, for the duration of the appellate process."
I Googled the case number, 4:21-cv-01245-P, but not a lot of results. Could it be that the state was still in the appeal process during the 2023 legislative session and that's why there seem to be no modifications of the statutes to accommodate this? Yeah; I'm still confused.![]()
Search found 4 matches
Return to “Arlington Parks Mall Shooting”
- Thu Jan 04, 2024 11:01 am
- Forum: The Crime Blotter
- Topic: Arlington Parks Mall Shooting
- Replies: 22
- Views: 138264
Re: Arlington Parks Mall Shooting
- Tue Jan 02, 2024 10:15 am
- Forum: The Crime Blotter
- Topic: Arlington Parks Mall Shooting
- Replies: 22
- Views: 138264
Re: Arlington Parks Mall Shooting
I don't know whether it's a requirement for 18-20 year olds to open carry, but I know a federal judge ruled Texas law prohibiting them from open carrying without an LTC to be unconstitutional. The open carry law requires a belt holster or shoulder holster AFAIK.The Annoyed Man wrote: ↑Tue Jan 02, 2024 9:52 am As to whether or not 18-20yr olds can lawfully carry in Texas, I have fingerprinted a number of them for their LTCs, and one was open carrying sans license when I fingerprinted him. My understanding is that 18-20yr olds carrying without a license must open carry. Does that sound right?
On a related subject, some months ago I fingerprinted an assistant prosecutor for Dallas County, who told me that they had successfully prosecuted several otherwise law-abiding adult citizens for carrying in a non-prescribed manner without a license. I don’t know if it’s true or not…and I honestly don’t care…but he said that permitless carry required the use of either a belt holster or a shoulder holster, and the accused in these cases were not using either when they got popped.
I need to review the law to see what it says.
- Sun Dec 31, 2023 1:57 pm
- Forum: The Crime Blotter
- Topic: Arlington Parks Mall Shooting
- Replies: 22
- Views: 138264
Re: Arlington Parks Mall Shooting
I wasn't addressing the ability to possess a firearm by a thug or anyone and I never said they don't have 2nd Amendment rights. I just don't think permit-less carry is the cause of incidents such as the one reported and don't worry that it will lead to blood on the streets.anygunanywhere wrote: ↑Sun Dec 31, 2023 10:42 amEven thugs have 2A rights until convicted of a crime. Last time I read the 2A it didn't mention thugs or thugless people. Being a thug, jerk, dunce, idiot, fool, dolt, or blockhead doesn't disqualify a citizen from their 2A right to carry a firearm.Jose_in_Dallas wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 10:21 amTrue but certainly clears up the grey area of who is legal to carry or not i.e. background check for License To Carry and some thug "who is of age" and wants to carry a gun because he feels he has the right to because of constitutional carry. One more charge to tack on as well.
- Sat Dec 30, 2023 9:37 am
- Forum: The Crime Blotter
- Topic: Arlington Parks Mall Shooting
- Replies: 22
- Views: 138264
Re: Arlington Parks Mall Shooting
I may be wrong, but thugs like these aren't incentivized by permit-less carry laws.Jose_in_Dallas wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 1:40 am Sigh. Another reason why I'm not a fan of constitutional carry. I actually go to this mall, and Northpark, fairly often as far as malls go. But strictly for the movie theater. I only go during the day and almost always a matinee showing. Never at night.