Of course, that wouldn't prevent the court from saying "It's not our job to make law, Wickard v Filburn stands and if you want to change it, that's what Congress is for."UpTheIrons wrote:If you have 15-20 states (or more) who have passed nullification, and they are all pushing back on the same point (Filburn or related commerce-clause precedent), then the court cannot brush it off as a minor thing, but have to take it seriously.
Search found 1 match
Return to “Oklahoma Declaring Nullification”
- Thu Apr 22, 2010 12:35 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Oklahoma Declaring Nullification
- Replies: 30
- Views: 3308