TexasCHLforum.com

cyphertext wrote: and is not an accepted social norm.

"...and ladies and gentlemen of the jury, THIS is exactly where our Constitutuion began to wither on the vine..."

(and how men came to wear skinny jeans with decorated pockets, which is a while 'nother thread in and of itself)

The Annoyed Man wrote:I believe that the 2nd Amendment right is ought to be unlimited. Balanced against that, I believe that some portion of the time, its full expression isn't wise. That is why I am glad that OC passed, but also why I won't be doing it myself most of the time.

I feel the same way about free speech too.

.....we have free speech, but "we shouldn't yell FIRE in a movie theater" either.

TAM, you nailed the answer for me. Thank you.

Happy new year!!

Thanks for the response C-dub! I appreciate you sharing your viewpoint.

So, if one agrees with CC, but not OC....is it possible to be a partial 2A supporter?

In other words....can someone support 2A rights....but only to a certain extent...i.e. not exercising 2A rights that might make others "uncomfortable"?

I'm curious, because I think you're either all in, or you're not.

No flames wanted, just honest discourse.

Happy 2016!