TexasCHLforum.com

I just wish the climate change industry would actually use the scientific method and not falsify their data in order to prove their theory. It would also be great for scientific research and study to not suppress scientists who disagree with them.

But I think we all agree that a scientist in any field is not an expert on guns and crime - even if he is a rocket scientist.

C-dub wrote:That entire thing is a bunch of hooey!

Even the whole climate change thing is junk. That whole mess is based on one theoretical computer model with biased data input and contradictory data left out. IOW, the conclusion was inevitable based on the data put in. Or in an old computer term GIGO. Garbage In - Garbage Out

When global cooling, (OOPS) global warming, (OOPS) climate change scientists intentionally falsify, inflate, or omit data to prove their "scientific" theory, then it's no longer science. Sadly it has become a religion that seeks to destroy all who do not hold to the dogma of their religion - especially "apostate" scientists whose careers are threatened or ruined. Climate changers are the "flat earthers".

Though IANAL, couldn't the "climate change" industry be a text book definition of racketeering? It appears many in it are profiting from offering to solve a problem that they know is based upon falsified/inflated/omitted data.