The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld California's ban on magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds. Crazy that they found that those magazines are neither arms nor protected accessories.
Interesting thing, Judge Lawrence VanDyk in his dissent, made a video that refuted their majority opinion.
“It is so easy to demonstrate the conceptual failings of the majority’s new test that even a caveman with just a video recorder and a firearm could do it,” VanDyke wrote in his dissent.
VanDyke responded that the majority’s real concern was that his video “unmasks their invented constitutional test as obviously grounded in a factual fantasy.”
https://dailycaller.com/2025/03/20/fede ... ment-case/
Search found 2 matches
Return to “California Magazine Capacity ban struck down”
- Fri Mar 21, 2025 9:56 am
- Forum: Other States
- Topic: California Magazine Capacity ban struck down
- Replies: 2
- Views: 6155
- Fri Sep 22, 2023 4:31 pm
- Forum: Other States
- Topic: California Magazine Capacity ban struck down
- Replies: 2
- Views: 6155
California Magazine Capacity ban struck down
Benitez ruled “there is no American tradition of limiting ammunition capacity.” He said detachable magazines “solved a problem with historic firearms: running out of ammunition and having to slowly reload a gun.”
“There have been, and there will be, times where many more than 10 rounds are needed to stop attackers,” Benitez wrote. “Yet, under this statute, the State says ‘too bad.’”
https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/ne ... -magazines
Good Twiiter/X thread here from Kostas Moros:
“There have been, and there will be, times where many more than 10 rounds are needed to stop attackers,” Benitez wrote. “Yet, under this statute, the State says ‘too bad.’”
https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/ne ... -magazines
Good Twiiter/X thread here from Kostas Moros: