Search found 1 match

by KRM45
Sat Jan 03, 2009 11:06 am
Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
Topic: 9 mm. vs 40 cal
Replies: 40
Views: 5228

Re: 9 mm. vs 40 cal

357 wrote:I am in the process of purchasing a sub compact handgun for business and home protection. I just finished the CHL clas which was awesome. I passed the shooting with a 9 mm, regular size (that was the first time I had shot a pistol). I've been told so many stories about the 9mm vs the 40 cal. What kind of information can you guys give me concerning this. I'll be purchansing a gun in about 2 weeks.[/b]
Thanks

357
Congratulations on successfully completing the CHL class. Now let the rest of the learning process begin. :tiphat:

You can do it the hard way, like I did, and end up with a safe full of guns you don't use, and a drawer full of holsters you don't like. Or you can get a feel for what works for other people then find a range that rent guns and go try some of them out. It sounds like you're on the right track. :tiphat:

As far as my recomendation goes, I personally don't like the .40 caliber in a sub-compact. The recoil is too snappy for me. I like it ok in a compact, or full size where I can get a good two handed grip, but not on the smaller frame.

I like my 5 shot snub nose revolver in .38/.357 for times when I want greater concealment. The available rounds cover a wider range.

Bottom line, I recommend you carry a major caliber like .38, 9mm, .357, .357sig, .40, .45, etc. The rest depends on how you plan to carry it, and what you personally shoot best. With that said, the Keltec .380 in your pocket will serve you better than the .45 you left at home...

Return to “9 mm. vs 40 cal”