Search found 1 match

by joe817
Fri Sep 02, 2016 9:29 pm
Forum: Self-Defense Reports
Topic: TX: Deadly force in defense of 3rd party against unarmed assailant
Replies: 17
Views: 7939

Re: TX: Deadly force in defense of 3rd party against unarmed assailant

Vol Texan wrote:
Jusme wrote:Replace step dad with a female, replace younger brother with another female. If the shooter was not physically able to stop the attack. Shooting the attacker may have saved a life. Deadly force does not have to involve a weapon. The attacker could have killed the victim with only hands and feet. I don't believe any charges will be forthcoming for the shooter. JMHO
Spot on...unarmed does not mean un-deadly.
:iagree: totally. Disparity of force is always a deciding factor, IMO.

Return to “TX: Deadly force in defense of 3rd party against unarmed assailant”