TexasCHLforum.com

Vol Texan wrote:

Solaris wrote:

warnmar10 wrote:
What if the BG had beat up/disarmed CHL Instructor and used the gun to shoot the store clerk?

Yeah that goes to the problem of OC, he showed his cards, and thus limited his response choices and perhaps made himself a target. Then he drew, further limiting his choices. dead guy was pushing him around, and he could not fight back, and had trouble maintaining his balance. then he got himself backed into a corner, it looked like he left himself with 2 choices, holster and go hands on or shoot. He chose option 2.

Like I said, I cannot find a single thing he did right.

He lived.

You win.

I'll start off by saying that I'm glad the shooter isn't being prosecuted and very sorry to aggressor is dead. It is very unfortunate that it ended that way.

However, I'm confused about why the shooter isn't being prosecuted. I guess LA's standard for the threat of deadly force is different than ours because I don't see that the shooters use of the threat of deadly force was justified. It was a one on one situation and the aggressor had no weapon and was not too dissimilar in size.