I was in the middle of responding and my internet dropped off and I had to reboot.
So, we're all in agreement that the M249 is belt fed?
On the machine gun definition itself, I can certainly be wrong having been a mere airedale squid aviation electronics tech. with no practical experience in the weapons we're discussing.
Search found 5 matches
Return to “PC §46.01. Section 9 - Definition of Machine Gun - Still confused”
- Thu Jan 07, 2016 8:32 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: PC §46.01. Section 9 - Definition of Machine Gun - Still confused
- Replies: 15
- Views: 2553
- Thu Jan 07, 2016 7:49 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: PC §46.01. Section 9 - Definition of Machine Gun - Still confused
- Replies: 15
- Views: 2553
Re: PC §46.01. Section 9 - Definition of Machine Gun - Still confused
http://www.military.com/equipment/m249- ... tic-weaponJP171 wrote:nope its not, the 240 is the 249 isn't
The M249 Squad Automatic Weapon, or SAW, is an individually portable, gas operated, magazine or disintegrating metallic link-belt fed, light machine gun ...
- Thu Jan 07, 2016 7:42 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: PC §46.01. Section 9 - Definition of Machine Gun - Still confused
- Replies: 15
- Views: 2553
Re: PC §46.01. Section 9 - Definition of Machine Gun - Still confused
Hold on a second. The SAW is belt fed.JP171 wrote:negative C dub, the m-249 saw or squad automatic weapon isn't belt fed, nor is the mp-9 or many others and they are machine guns. the m-16 or m-4 battle rifles are not machine guns they are select fire weapons machine guns aren't they are either all or nothing no single shot optionC-dub wrote:I'm not sure, but maybe they didn't want a double barrel shotgun to be classified as a machine gun. However, to further confuse you in case you weren't aware, but a machine gun is different than a fully automatic gun. A fully automatic M16 is not a machine gun. IIRC, to be a machine gun it must be belt-fed.
- Thu Jan 07, 2016 7:40 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: PC §46.01. Section 9 - Definition of Machine Gun - Still confused
- Replies: 15
- Views: 2553
Re: PC §46.01. Section 9 - Definition of Machine Gun - Still confused
Really? I thought I'd read that here somewhere. Kinda like, all machine guns are automatic, but not all automatics are machine guns. I thought for sure that a machine gun was belt fed and that was the difference from a regular ole full-auto.JP171 wrote:negative C dub, the m-249 saw or squad automatic weapon isn't belt fed, nor is the mp-9 or many others and they are machine guns. the m-16 or m-4 battle rifles are not machine guns they are select fire weapons machine guns aren't they are either all or nothing no single shot optionC-dub wrote:I'm not sure, but maybe they didn't want a double barrel shotgun to be classified as a machine gun. However, to further confuse you in case you weren't aware, but a machine gun is different than a fully automatic gun. A fully automatic M16 is not a machine gun. IIRC, to be a machine gun it must be belt-fed.
- Thu Jan 07, 2016 6:07 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: PC §46.01. Section 9 - Definition of Machine Gun - Still confused
- Replies: 15
- Views: 2553
Re: PC §46.01. Section 9 - Definition of Machine Gun - Still confused
I'm not sure, but maybe they didn't want a double barrel shotgun to be classified as a machine gun. However, to further confuse you in case you weren't aware, but a machine gun is different than a fully automatic gun. A fully automatic M16 is not a machine gun. IIRC, to be a machine gun it must be belt-fed.