Hah. Those aren't for double stack .45, but point taken. After looking around a bit there is certainly some interesting stuff out there if someone really wanted to carry a bunch of extra rounds of just about anything. I do have two double pouch paddle holsters, but don't really want to carry four double stack .45 13-round mags on my belt and the gun.Excaliber wrote:I'm glad you asked. Your answer can be found here.C-dub wrote:Excellent solution. Hmmm, wonder where I can carry that third spare mag.Excaliber wrote:I went through the same soul searching and came up with a different solution - more .45 ACP magazines!Charles L. Cotton wrote:I just couldn't do it; I tried, but I just couldn't!! I now have a hi-cap handgun on my hip and I still have a 1911 .45ACP on my hip. I forgot about a gun I haven't shot in at least 15 to 20 years. It's a Paraordnance frame, Caspian slide, Wilson barrel (wouldn't do that again), Bomar sights and Brown parts. I had it built when I was shooting IPSC and Paraordnance was only making frames. It's a bit on the heavy side, but I was surprised that the felt weight isn't much if any heavier than my 5" Government Model. Life is good!Charles L. Cotton wrote:This is a very good read, even though it brings tears to the eyes of a die-hard 1911 .45ACP guy. I've been seriously considering switching to an M&P 9 for daily carry because of the greatly increased firepower. (17+1 with 1 or 2 more mags.) I've never worried about the ammo load until the ISIS issue came up. However, the extra ammo could play a role in "ordinary" shootings since it seems thugs have realized that there are more effective with multiple attackers.
My wife carries a Kimber Ultra Carry in .45ACP and she may switch to an M&P 9 Compact. She'd be doing it more because the reduced felt recoil would be easier on her hands. Arthritis is making it somewhat painful to shoot her Kimber.
Chas.
Chas.
Search found 6 matches
Return to “9MM Justification; FBI Training Division”
- Tue Nov 04, 2014 9:28 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: 9MM Justification; FBI Training Division
- Replies: 36
- Views: 9086
Re: 9MM Justification; FBI Training Division
- Tue Nov 04, 2014 8:47 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: 9MM Justification; FBI Training Division
- Replies: 36
- Views: 9086
Re: 9MM Justification; FBI Training Division
AndyC wrote:Nothing wrong with a 9mm IF you have the skills to make up for the smaller caliber.
- Tue Nov 04, 2014 7:34 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: 9MM Justification; FBI Training Division
- Replies: 36
- Views: 9086
Re: 9MM Justification; FBI Training Division
Excellent solution. Hmmm, wonder where I can carry that third spare mag.Excaliber wrote:I went through the same soul searching and came up with a different solution - more .45 ACP magazines!Charles L. Cotton wrote:I just couldn't do it; I tried, but I just couldn't!! I now have a hi-cap handgun on my hip and I still have a 1911 .45ACP on my hip. I forgot about a gun I haven't shot in at least 15 to 20 years. It's a Paraordnance frame, Caspian slide, Wilson barrel (wouldn't do that again), Bomar sights and Brown parts. I had it built when I was shooting IPSC and Paraordnance was only making frames. It's a bit on the heavy side, but I was surprised that the felt weight isn't much if any heavier than my 5" Government Model. Life is good!Charles L. Cotton wrote:This is a very good read, even though it brings tears to the eyes of a die-hard 1911 .45ACP guy. I've been seriously considering switching to an M&P 9 for daily carry because of the greatly increased firepower. (17+1 with 1 or 2 more mags.) I've never worried about the ammo load until the ISIS issue came up. However, the extra ammo could play a role in "ordinary" shootings since it seems thugs have realized that there are more effective with multiple attackers.
My wife carries a Kimber Ultra Carry in .45ACP and she may switch to an M&P 9 Compact. She'd be doing it more because the reduced felt recoil would be easier on her hands. Arthritis is making it somewhat painful to shoot her Kimber.
Chas.
Chas.
- Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:56 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: 9MM Justification; FBI Training Division
- Replies: 36
- Views: 9086
Re: 9MM Justification; FBI Training Division
I feel some of your pain Charles. I'm not a 1911 guy, but TAM converted me over to .45ACP a couple years ago when he let me shoot a new Kimber he had at the time. Now, I am really enjoying the two double-stack Glocks, 21SF and 30SF, the latter for EDC. I keep the regular 10 rounder in the gun, so 10+1, and two 13 round spares on the other side. So, while I don't have as many rounds as I'd have with a 9mm, I do have closer to a 9mm number of rounds than a 1911 does and in a flying ashtray that I'm doing better with all the time.
- Fri Sep 26, 2014 7:05 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: 9MM Justification; FBI Training Division
- Replies: 36
- Views: 9086
Re: 9MM Justification; FBI Training Division
C'mon, go big if you're going to do it. F350mojo84 wrote:Too many reasons to list. I've been thinking about getting a big ole F-250 and jack it up to compensate though.Pawpaw wrote:Then where does your inferiority complex come from?mojo84 wrote:I have no inferiority complex from carrying 9mm.
- Thu Sep 25, 2014 5:31 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: 9MM Justification; FBI Training Division
- Replies: 36
- Views: 9086
Re: 9MM Justification; FBI Training Division
We've known for quite some time now that shot placement is far more important. With little discernible difference in caliber performance on soft tissue, maybe the discussion should move to the effects on bone or other materials like various types of doors or other things. Where does that lead us in the caliber wars?