I know it could be possible, but couldn't it also be possible to prevent that from happening within a bill? I don't have the answer, but I do see conservatives paralyzed by fear of the possibility of what the liberals might try. The problem is that we, conservatives, are truly concerned what others think, while liberals don't care.OldCannon wrote:"In light of the passage of the Militia Act, the State of New York has declared that the state has sufficient numbers of police and national guard units for any contingency. New York will not grant additional IDs to non-police or non-National Guard individuals for any reason. Ownership of any weapons, other than specific single-shot rifles and shotguns outlined in the regulations below, is a felony punishable by no less than 20 years in prison."
Anytime somebody proposes a new law, I fantasize what that law will look like after it passes through congress. Most times it looks a lot like hay, after it has passed through a horse.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “2nd Amendment misunderstood?”
- Thu Aug 02, 2012 9:26 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: 2nd Amendment misunderstood?
- Replies: 24
- Views: 4299
Re: 2nd Amendment misunderstood?
- Thu Aug 02, 2012 9:19 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: 2nd Amendment misunderstood?
- Replies: 24
- Views: 4299
Re: 2nd Amendment misunderstood?
Welcome to the forum Marine.CTMarine87 wrote:Hey Gents,
