Maybe that one makes sense and is just one step closer to removing the requirement.74novaman wrote:And to make that more confusing, there is no PENALTY for failing to show an LEO your license when pulled over, but its still REQUIRED.C-dub wrote:For a lot of things that is correct, but there are some things that still don't. One example is the requirement to show your license to an officer (if you're carrying at the time) that is not there if carrying under the MPA.Kadelic wrote:I was just wondering this myself. My CHL instructor was right about things making more sense in Texas than in other state.
