Really?! That is interesting.CC Italian wrote:With the Glocks that would be a little hard to do. All the slides are thicker and wider on .45acp and 10mm rounds and the grip is still a little bigger even on the SF models. You could compare it to the 10mm, which I have but that is not the info you are looking for. Full house 10mm has more recoil then the .45acp+P but its still very manageable. When I load the slow 180 grain American Eagles my Glock 20 has less recoil then my fathers Glock 22 with 180 grain American Eagles. Even though the 10mm ammo runs a little faster it doesn't matter. The slide weighs so much more it soaks up the recoil better.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “My hatred of the .40 S&W, by request”
- Thu Sep 15, 2011 8:22 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: My hatred of the .40 S&W, by request
- Replies: 51
- Views: 7817
Re: My hatred of the .40 S&W, by request
- Tue Sep 13, 2011 8:25 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: My hatred of the .40 S&W, by request
- Replies: 51
- Views: 7817
Re: My hatred of the .40 S&W, by request
Hey there Gigag04.
There you go getting all logical on me. I agree with everything you said and I would not have been able to do that until TAM let me shoot his .45 one day at the range. I would have never given the .45 a chance, perceiving it as a larger round that would have more recoil than my .40's. Wow! Was I wrong.
It's all your fault TAM. I have been thinking more and more about a .45 in a Glock or some 1911.
There you go getting all logical on me. I agree with everything you said and I would not have been able to do that until TAM let me shoot his .45 one day at the range. I would have never given the .45 a chance, perceiving it as a larger round that would have more recoil than my .40's. Wow! Was I wrong.
It's all your fault TAM. I have been thinking more and more about a .45 in a Glock or some 1911.