Sorry everyone!C-dub wrote:Yes, but he did say the red parts. Isn't that notice? I would have taken that as notice.Teamless wrote:If he were to say "We had to explain to the usher that we don't allow guns in the sanctuary" or, "After that, the church adopted a rule to prohibit guns from our buildings."TrueFlog wrote: lest he should accidentally give me oral notice!
neither are oral notice to you, as he was talking anecdotal, not informing you, at least that is how I would have taken it.
Remember that "adopting a rule......." is not notice, unless he verbally stated that "you are not allowed to carry here", unless they actually had the 30.06 wording in a manual that you were required to read, much like an employee has to have at work where it is not allowed, or they have to post the fully official 30.06 sign, in size, contract, and languages.
We need a backwards walking smiley so I can backtrack. After re-reading this thread thinking I might have missed something I found it. The parts I was basing my opinion that Trueflog had been given notice were incorrectly based on something Teamless speculated about. I would have considered the parts in red notice except that I didn't pay any attention to the beginning part of the sentence, now in blue.