TexasCHLforum.com

safety1 wrote:I agree why is everybody tip toeing around this issue. Why must we just feel like taken baby steps and just getting parking lots and campus carry passed is enough. With 66% of the lawmakers in our favor ????? why are we not pushing harder. We want to build on what we have I agree, and yes I undstand the political process. We need to move forward with this as many PRO gun states have done years ago.

The reason we or anyone else must be careful when "pushing" for OC is that resistance is a natural reaction to being pushed. People don't like being pushed and lawmakers are no exception. If someone is pushed too much they will eventually push back.

So, then for the states where a CC license is needed to OC, I guess the same sign prohibits both? What I and others are wondering is in states that have both does one sign prohibit both or if two different signs are required and if only one sign is needed did the usage of that sign increase? The answer might be "no" because I would venture to guess that OC was legal long before OC was and not that many people OC in the first place.

I am kind of sorta in favor of OC. I might or might not do it, but like many, I think it could make things easier in the HOT summer months or other circumstances. As far as a bill, though, wouldn't it be easier or better to get the laws removed that make OC illegal?

For my next question, I really don't know the answer so I'm not trying to set anyone up. In the states that have OC and CC, how does it work there? If there is anyone here from one of those states can you tell us? Does one sign prohibit both?

However, I would rather have more freedom to CC than the right to OC returned and lose some of our CC rights.