I was thinking that the likelihood of a conservative minded individual would be less inclined to put such a ban in place because I think they are more likely to understand that a sign or policy will not stop someone from bringing a gun inside to kill someone. I would also not even begin to presume that only a liberal minded person would pass the buck rightly or wrongly.b322da wrote:For what it might be worth, I agree entirely, C-dub, except for two of your words: "liberal minded." An employer need not necessarily be "liberal minded" in order to wrongly and dishonestly pass the buck, rather than have the courage to honestly justify his own possibly mistaken policy to his employees. I am not accusing any particular employer or person of this, but it would not surprise me if we were to see this happen.C-dub wrote:I have always wondered about the truth of someone that claims they have to ban guns because of the insurance company. I have always thought it was an excuse by a liberal minded business owner to place the blame on someone else for banning the employees from having guns on the premises or in some cases even the parking lot.
Elmo
Search found 2 matches
- Fri Sep 24, 2010 4:09 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: civil liability?
- Replies: 21
- Views: 3458
Re: civil liability?
- Fri Sep 24, 2010 11:30 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: civil liability?
- Replies: 21
- Views: 3458
Re: civil liability?
I have always wondered about the truth of someone that claims they have to ban guns because of the insurance company. I have always thought it was an excuse by a liberal minded business owner to place the blame on someone else for banning the employees from having guns on the premises or in some cases even the parking lot.