Search found 2 matches

by C-dub
Thu Mar 04, 2010 5:25 pm
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: Starbucks stance on gun control
Replies: 13
Views: 1655

Re: Starbucks stance on gun control

It may be the way the law is written in WA. He mentioned something about a "right to self-defense" and that no government could deny someone their right to self-defense. And he made it a point to say that a store like this was open to the public. There might be a slight difference here between my property I live on versus a business that depends on the public for survival.
by C-dub
Thu Mar 04, 2010 3:37 pm
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: Starbucks stance on gun control
Replies: 13
Views: 1655

Re: Starbucks stance on gun control

Judge Napolitano was just on Fox News and he was saying that Starbucks, being a business that is open to and welcomes the public, CANNOT ban people from carrying their weapons. He may have meant open carry, but he didn't specifically say that. He went on to compare that to discriminating against someone based on race or religion. I'm not sure what Washington's laws are regarding one's personal property rights, but he said they could not keep people from carrying their weapons inside. :headscratch

Return to “Starbucks stance on gun control”