Search found 1 match

by C-dub
Tue Jan 26, 2010 7:00 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: anti-CHL editorial Austin Statesman 1-26-10
Replies: 42
Views: 6192

Re: anti-CHL editorial Austin Statesman 1-26-10

3dfxMM wrote:Would they have any grounds to refuse entry to a CHL holder who was armed?
Currently, no. This nut job wants to change that. It might be worth pointing out to him that the guy shot up the outside of the building. He could have done that with all the metal detectors in the world at every entrance. It also might be worth mentioning that I don't necessarily have my CHL to protect him. It is primarily to protect me and my family. His protection is primarily up to him even though he thinks it is law enforcement's job.

On a side note, I'm not trying to funny or inflammatory , but are police really considered professionals when it comes to the handling of weapons? As the author stated, many non-LE personnel can be well trained. Police are people to and often make mistakes. Wasn't there a thread somewhere around here that discussed the average number of shots fired in a confrontation by the police versus the average citizen and the citizen's number was lower?

Return to “anti-CHL editorial Austin Statesman 1-26-10”