That sounds like a verbose, yet still 100% accurate, way of saying, "It's better to be tried by 12 than carried by 6." I concur.Beiruty wrote:If the means of self-defense were to be made illegal to own and use and where the criminals will continue to have said banned deadly means,
Then, one can conclude that even the illegal use of said banned means to terminate the threat of criminal or criminals using said deadly means to protect life and life of family is better outcome then being dead, or one of the family being dead at the hands of said criminals. One can bear the outcome of being charged with UWP.
