TexasCHLforum.com

Maybe we can get the "not" added like above.

speedsix wrote:Gov. Perry said it well at the end of the last legislature...he said anyone who qualifies for a CHL should be able to carry ANYWHERE...now there's common sense in action...

There is already too much discrimination in chapter 46. An off duty CPA with a CHL should be able to carry everywhere an off duty LEO can carry. More discrimination against voters is not the answer. It would be wrong to give special treatment to more people who are supposed to be public servants.

Unethical behavior is a deal-breaker for me and I feel HB 1463 and SB 905 are unethical. Therefore, I cannot in good conscience vote for anyone who votes for those bills, no matter what possible redeeming features they may have.

It's a moral and ethical issue, and unethical behavior is a deal-breaker for me, all talk of nose-cutting notwithstanding.

The bill is immoral. Any legislators who vote for it are voting against the people who elected them, and should lose their jobs.