TexasCHLforum.com

You look to what the Founding Fathers mean't when they wrote whatever given part of the Constitution you happen to be talking about. You first read the Constitution. You understand it they way the Founding Fathers intended. If you need help, you go to their writings and speeches. You think like they do.

You DON'T take a sentence out of context and use it for some modern political agenda. (such as liberals using "well regulated militia" to mean the national guard only can have guns) That is clearly not what they mean't. To use the Constitution subjectively and selectively like this is to pervert it and essentially say "we have no constitution"

Ron Paul sees the Constitution as it was originally written. He interprets it's language as the original writers did (which is the proper way to interpret any document). The other's (Democrats and Republicans)make it's language to mean whatever they want it to mean today to suit whatever they want. Republicans might talk a lot about the Constitution and State's Rights, but it is just patriotic noise and no patriotic reality.

Ron Paul gets my vote