Purplehood wrote:Wow. And you have never seen that happen before in a Senate hearing on either side of the aisle?jimlongley wrote:All I see in that exchange is someone refusing to answer the question as asked, and again I have to wonder if she would allow such a thing to happen in her court.
I thiink we not only ave reason to be worried, I think we should all be writing to our Senators to object to her confirmation, based strictly on her refusal to answer direct questions openly and honestly, as I have done.
Here's MHO If you don't answer a direct question, you should not be able to vote on that topic at all, furthermore you should not be allow to to speak on the subject at all. 
Simple NO ANSWER = NO VOTE, OR ANYTHING TO DO WITH IT..
My .01 ( cutbacks from my .02 )