The average person would be more likely to have a run in with state and local law enforcement, not the feds. Yes the Feds could still charge someone if they were found out, but if it were legal by state law and our police couldn't cooperate with the feds on this issue then you would see a whole lot less people going to prison solely for having a suppressor.The Annoyed Man wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2019 10:17 am ATF regs would still apply, no matter what law a state passes. Regulation of suppressors still falls under federal jurisdiction, and if the feds say you have to wait for a tax stamp, then you have to wait, and you still have to pay the fee.
The fastest way to get a suppressor remains filing a form 1 and building your own. (And, it’s a lot cheaper too.)
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Possible New Suppressor Bill HB 2286”
- Mon Jun 03, 2019 7:53 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Possible New Suppressor Bill HB 2286
- Replies: 19
- Views: 8125
Re: Possible New Suppressor Bill HB 2286
- Wed May 29, 2019 6:26 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Possible New Suppressor Bill HB 2286
- Replies: 19
- Views: 8125
Re: Possible New Suppressor Bill HB 2286
The session is over its dead. It was killed by the Republican chairwoman, Joan Huffman, because she choose not to give it a hearing.
She also killed or neutered a few other pro-liberty bills.