Hmm...has anyone ever even come close to successfully rebutting that presumption? Something like showing up to court with a bottle, drinking to .15, and beating Kasparov at chess while juggling razor blades and reciting poetry, maybe?AFCop wrote:Actually the 0.08 is not an absolute on you being "legally" impaired.... You are violating the law simply becuase your BAC is 0.08 or above. Your BAC over 0.08 is prima facie evidence (presumed) you are intoxicated. Kinda like the basic and absolute speed law...
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Question I should have asked in class”
- Tue Dec 14, 2010 11:35 pm
- Forum: New to CHL?
- Topic: Question I should have asked in class
- Replies: 44
- Views: 8217
Re: Question I should have asked in class
- Fri Oct 16, 2009 5:52 am
- Forum: New to CHL?
- Topic: Question I should have asked in class
- Replies: 44
- Views: 8217
Re: Question I should have asked in class
What if you're also locked in the trunk?wford wrote:Seems to me the criteria would be if the gun is on or about the license holder's person. Locked in the trunk would seem to be safe.
Pretty sure on or about means within reach.
(Though that generally happens well past .08)