A Taurus PT92 weigh SUBSTANTIALLY more than a Sigma or any other polymer-framed gun. approximately 34 oz unloaded for PT92 compared to about 24 oz unloaded for Sigma. Not a huge deal if this is strictly a glovebox gun. But if it ever needs to be carried, can make a difference unless you also spend an extra $100-$200 on quality gun belt and holster. I've carried Glocks (same relative size/weight as Sigma) in $15 nylon holster attached to a $15 belt from Wal Mart .... not recommended, and not as comfortable as a quality belt/holster rig .... but can be done with a polymer-frame gun - doubt you could comfortably do same all-day with something as large and heavy as a PT92RECIT wrote:I agree, nothing ever negative said about the Millenium. I don't own either but have pulled both triggers before. I would buy the Taurus in a heart beat over the Sigma. Or you could have gotten a Taurus PT92 for $299.00 a month or so ago on sale and never looked back.E150GT wrote:WOW! I had heard about the triggers and I finally got to see for myself what was being said. Talk about a trigger! I think I bruised my finger trying to pull that thing? Since we are stating opinions here, I think I would forgo the Sigma and get a Millenium pro in DAO. Its got a better trigger and has a restrike capability for around the same price. Just sayin...
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Not the best, but good enough”
- Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:38 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Not the best, but good enough
- Replies: 13
- Views: 1953
Re: Not the best, but good enough
- Thu Jun 10, 2010 10:17 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Not the best, but good enough
- Replies: 13
- Views: 1953
Re: Not the best, but good enough
Will OP post links to explanations (or his own explanations) of how to do these trigger mods? Don't own a Sigma - have always avoided them because of the "bad trigger" reputation. But I'm curious ...