That's in the testimony, but I think in general, the argument that was publicly put forth the most by those in favor of campus carry has been that it will make campuses safer by being able to stop active shooters. That's also what Sen. Wentworth concentrated on when arguing for it in the Senate.apostate wrote:When you listen to the testimony at the committee hearings, that's what we did.J.R.@A&M wrote:My main thought about 2013 campus carry is to frame it more in terms of deterrence/prevention of general violent crime, both on an off campus, versus focusing on the mass shooting/Va Tech scenario. The other side appeared to be successful in framing the issue as "making the campus safer" and pointing out that mass shootings are rare. The point is to make individuals safer (or at least give them the choice). The "campus" is just a geographical abstraction.
By and large, the testimony for HB 750 and SB 354 talked about street crime. We explained that criminals cross property lines, so we need the ability to protect ourselves on both sides of the line. We talked about walking to our cars late at night, after class or study sessions. We talked about people who live nearby and walk or bicycle to campus, and are disarmed during their entire commute. We talked about people who rely on public transportation and are likewise at risk during their entire commute, including their time waiting alone at a bus stop. All because of an unnecessary law with no proven benefit.
The testimony against HB 750 and SB 354 was the broken record of mass shootings and their rarity. It was John Woods and his one-trick-pony brigade that focused on Virginia Tech. They would occasionally mention Charles Whitman, and one or two may have said Walt Whitman, but the bulk of their arguments against HB 750 and SB 354 were (1) VT and (2) their fear of civil rights.
In short, our testimony was about being safe whereas their testimony was about feeling safe.
Search found 4 matches
- Sat May 21, 2011 11:14 pm
- Forum: 2011 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: HB 3639 - SB 1581
- Replies: 383
- Views: 87166
Re: HB 3639 - SB 1581
- Thu May 19, 2011 11:22 pm
- Forum: 2011 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: HB 3639 - SB 1581
- Replies: 383
- Views: 87166
Re: HB 3639 - SB 1581
Not a chance, I suspect. The governor would have to specifically add that as an allowed topic, and it's very unlikely he will do so. He could have done it 2 years ago when campus carry died at the end of the session because of the Democrats stalling the voter ID bill and he didn't.RPB wrote:Wonder if CampusCarry can be re-introduced in Special Session?
also
Wonder who the next Speaker of the House will be?
- Thu May 19, 2011 6:22 pm
- Forum: 2011 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: HB 3639 - SB 1581
- Replies: 383
- Views: 87166
Re: HB 3639 - SB 1581
The S&W Bodyguard 380 is a really nice small 380. Feels good in the hand, for a small gun, and to me has less perceived recoil than the LCP. You can pick them up for about $350.hirundo82 wrote:Yeah, I need to get hands-on with a G26 and see for myself. The KelTec looks like a good option, the LC9 seems to be priced very reasonably (<$400 in the most recent Academy flier), and Kahr also released a budget version of the PM9 recently.tacticool wrote:big timeaustinrealtor wrote:It is. Trust me. I've tried both. J-frame pocket carries MUCH better/easier than a baby Glock.hirundo82 wrote:G26 doesn't seem like it would be harder to pocket carry than the S&W 642 I use as a BUG now.
The small Kel-Tec 9s aren't a bad choice if you're on a budget. They may need some TLC but you have some time for tuning before 9/1 if campus carry fully passes this year.
Brian
- Fri May 13, 2011 8:33 pm
- Forum: 2011 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: HB 3639 - SB 1581
- Replies: 383
- Views: 87166
Re: HB 3639 - SB 1581
Maybe that was the appropriations committee meeting that happened earlier today?