i was thinking a similar thing, he sends me lots of emails and he seems to be on the right side alot of the time. He is slower to respond to emails. He did send us a very nice Christmas card with photo of him and his family. I know we paid for it with our taxes.PriestTheRunner wrote: ↑Wed Dec 23, 2020 4:14 pmI'd give him a chance. He voted AGAINST reUpping the patriot act as well as AGAINST the most recent Stimulus package disaster. His votes have been pretty good as of late so he might not have been wary of the letter ahead of time.powerboatr wrote: ↑Wed Dec 23, 2020 1:32 pm looks like i need to send a letter to my rep lance gooden. he was absent from the letter.
Search found 3 matches
- Wed Dec 23, 2020 10:15 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: ATF to Institute Rulemaking Regarding Stabilizing Braces and Require Registration of Currently Owned Braces
- Replies: 74
- Views: 24173
Re: ATF to Institute Rulemaking Regarding Stabilizing Braces and Require Registration of Currently Owned Braces
- Wed Dec 23, 2020 1:32 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: ATF to Institute Rulemaking Regarding Stabilizing Braces and Require Registration of Currently Owned Braces
- Replies: 74
- Views: 24173
Re: ATF to Institute Rulemaking Regarding Stabilizing Braces and Require Registration of Currently Owned Braces
looks like i need to send a letter to my rep lance gooden. he was absent from the letter.
- Tue Dec 22, 2020 10:19 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: ATF to Institute Rulemaking Regarding Stabilizing Braces and Require Registration of Currently Owned Braces
- Replies: 74
- Views: 24173
Re: ATF to Institute Rulemaking Regarding Stabilizing Braces and Require Registration of Currently Owned Braces
DITTOjason812 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 22, 2020 9:10 pmextremist wrote: ↑Tue Dec 22, 2020 6:08 pm I thought of another insidious possibility of consequences with allowing ATF to implement this rule and that is the following:
- by "allowing" us to register the brace equipped firearm now as a Title II weapon regulated by the NFA, it becomes less "transferrable" because now you can't just sell it to anyone, as a private sale and such. It has to be transferred so in effect, regulating the sale of private property without government permission. Easier to keep track of them don't you know.
- it's not too much of a stretch to imagine them doing this scheme next with the new "Assault weapons ban". Yes you can keep them as long as you register them for free. But now you can't buy and sell without permission.
- and the logical conclusion to both is them saying, "well now in the interest of public safety, you can no longer transfer them.
And that is how you eliminate private gun ownership in a generation or two.
The first step in confiscation is registration.