Search found 3 matches

by powerboatr
Thu Jan 05, 2012 2:54 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: NDAA (national defense auth. act)
Replies: 20
Views: 2100

Re: NDAA (national defense auth. act)

I don't think anyone's intelligence is ever questioned or meant to be inferred

the group will be small at first, think about the statements made by this and even previous administrations.

most recently, to the war time veterans. Some are on already on the list, simply because of their advanced training and ability to net results in the most arduous of assignments. then they are discharged or give it up to, save a marriage, are tired of over abundance of re-deployments, all humans have stressors that send them over the edge.
we as Americans enjoy and defend with fervor our right to speak our minds and try to make change when things are not right. we have elections and we write millions of letters to get attention and maybe make a difference.
now through in the group of "occupiers" they could be loosely defined as possible terrorists, they did in fact harass folks trying to get to work, and folks simply living near the groups base camps, they even stopped and closed several ports. that in itself could be an act of terrorism by interrupting commerce. funny thing was the union guys were pee oood and i don't think they felt threatened by the protestors. but the ports were closed.

back to us veterans, and how some in office feel we are the next home-growns or recruits because of training, experience, etc.

now add in a simple email letter to a friend about a fictitious story
include the key words that are being scanned for and see how long it takes before a dhs plated vehicle shows up at your door
I know some people in another state that are seriously scared to speak bad of the potus or his actions.
i am not worried, if i disappear, it would be noticed. maybe not found, but at least missed. ;-), i have been to gitmo on more than one occasion it has great fishing there.
I worked in a place that was super snoopy about all of our communications inter office and out of the office to other groups.
you know the the saying about not poking the bears.....some people simply by nature of their job have no sense of humor.

we shall speak our minds to educate and help make change without violence or the like.
we should always have intelligent discussions so we are educated

education is always the key, and the best weapon
by powerboatr
Wed Jan 04, 2012 6:40 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: NDAA (national defense auth. act)
Replies: 20
Views: 2100

Re: NDAA (national defense auth. act)

hi-power wrote:http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/01/04/42737.htm
...
During congressional debate, Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., who co-sponsored the bill, said the Obama administration instructed him to keep U.S. citizens subject to the detention statutes.
...
yes and thats what bothers me.
remember speaker pelosi telling the world that the tea party or anyone protesting bad government were on the lines of terrorists? then janet to say veterans were or could be homegrown terrorists.
but then she said the occupy nuts were OK :biggrinjester:

one swift order and we could all be on a plane with a black hood.
by powerboatr
Wed Jan 04, 2012 5:11 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: NDAA (national defense auth. act)
Replies: 20
Views: 2100

NDAA (national defense auth. act)

In a weird sort of way the presidents signing of the 2012 act to keep funding for our military and other agencies deemed by some proclamation to be defense oriented. This being said, it could be used as a gun control end around. It does contain verbiage allowing you or I to be detained without charge for an unspecified length of time, if there is a small piece of evidence that you could be a terrorist, or insurgent. the definition of those two terms is a broad as it gets
so if as legal firearm owning persons, make a statement that could be deemed as a threat, we could be detained and shipped to Guantanamo bay for an indefinite time. We already know that that big brother is scanning cell calls and emails and forums for certain words.
the president even went on to say he would not use the act to do such a thing.....but we all know elected officials say one thing then turn around and do the opposite.
Hitler did almost the same thing once he was in power and even dismantled the other bodies of government, like our congress.
with this act he could have the justice department essentially remove any congress person on the grounds they may be a terrorist. Imagine how dangerous this could be. its obvious to any normal person that congress does not have our countries best interest at heart.

in fact we could say the president and his administration plus many in congress are terrorists. How ? he/they has not secured the borders, he refuses to move forward with energy production here to make us NOT HELD HOSTAGE by foreign lands, I love that we exported more refined petroleum products last November than we imported, but it does not balance the scales.
we are being terrorized as Americans by a president and congress that wants us to be dependent on other governments. He wants us to be all one WORLD of people and take way our rights as US citizens
i know we must stop thinking out loud. didn't someone in DC pledge to close gitmo? before he changed his mind to keep it open?

Return to “NDAA (national defense auth. act)”