TexasCHLforum.com

"the first provision, led by Rep. Jackie Speier (D-CA), would have ignored constitutional due process protections and allowed for the confiscation of personally-owned firearms of members of the U.S. military. It would have afforded the military judicial system the ability to issue ex parte protective orders that would prohibit firearm possession without giving the accused an opportunity to contest the accusations against them and present evidence in their defense. This would have represented a clear denial of constitutional due process and a stunning betrayal of those who swore an oath to protect and defend our country and the U.S. Constitution."


that part is over the top scary.
just because your in the military does not give the military the right to violate ones constitutional rights. I cant believe this was ever considered in the bill, much less found its way through committees .

i have very strong opinions on it,
when i lived on base we had MANY firearms in our home, we had to give notice to security and prove they had at least a trigger lock and not accessible by a minor. EASY as pie. this did not give you permission to carry in your car at will, if you left the base with them to go to the range or hunting or whatever. you had to notify security that you were transiting and and of course at the gate upon return and it had to be trigger locked