our club is well over 60 years old, and I think the reasoning (at least in "modern times") for NRA membership is to have that little bit of assurance that potential members have some awareness of firearms use, safety, general operation, etc., and the assurance that potential members are really serious about the shooting "sports". Also, although I'm not a participant in the competition events, It may also have something to do with sanctioned events.
Regardless of the reasoning, I'm 100% for it.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Reuter's story undermining the NRA”
- Mon Feb 04, 2013 8:45 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Reuter's story undermining the NRA
- Replies: 20
- Views: 1913
- Mon Feb 04, 2013 2:02 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Reuter's story undermining the NRA
- Replies: 20
- Views: 1913
Re: Reuter's story undermining the NRA
my club/range requires NRA membership, and we number over 1500 members. I see no problem with private clubs setting their own membership standards, and apparantly quite a few of us in East Texas have no problem with it either.
what's the issue again?
what's the issue again?