TexasCHLforum.com

For those of you that have watched the video, I pose this scenario involving law and tactics:

If a CHL was in the store and chose to draw and shoot at the suspects, I imagine Texas law would not find him/her
at fault for shooting all 3 suspects. Even though only 1 of the BG's can be seen with a firearm, it seems that all 3
represent a potential threat during an armed robbery.

It seems a presumption of threat from all 3 of the BG's would be there, so even if 2 of them were later found to be
unarmed, it would still be a "good shoot".

Comments?

SIA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYcnhJ7lSWg

The above link is an armed robbery which took place in a convenience store on Douglass Road (yes, 2 s's) in
Nacogdoches, Texas (East Texas, north of Lufkin).

The 3 robbers wore wigs/hoodies and their faces are not really shown.

The 3 of them rush into the store, overpower the Asian mother and daughter working there, and helped
themselves to approximately $2,000 in cash. It seems that this amount should not have been mentioned,
so that other BG's won't rob them.

What seems most unique about this is that the 1 BG who has a gun seems to have revolver with a very long
barrel, maybe 6-8"? It looks like the kind of revolver they use in comic plays where the flag that says "BANG"
drops down from the barrel.

Can anyone ID the handgun which was used?

TIA / SIA