Purplehood said: ...I don't know what a S.O. is,
FYI: An S.O. is a "significant other", meaning a steady girlfriend or a wife.
For any other slang terms that you wish to research, go to www.urbandictionary.com.
SIA
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Austin Panhandlers”
- Mon Oct 26, 2009 10:26 pm
- Forum: Never Again!!
- Topic: Austin Panhandlers
- Replies: 75
- Views: 12029
- Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:15 am
- Forum: Never Again!!
- Topic: Austin Panhandlers
- Replies: 75
- Views: 12029
Re: Austin Panhandlers
The San Antonio TV station recently had a news item on the high number of panhandlers
at a particular strip mall in NW San Antonio at the corner of <some street> and I-410.
The reporters interviewed a few people. One of them was a rough, country kind of guy.
He told the reporter, ON FILM, that an aggressive panhandler threatened to kick his ____
for not giving him any money.
The man said that he responded by putting a .357 to the forehead of the panhandler before
running him off. No shot was fired.
This could have been just a lying blusterer appearing tough.
If he had actually done this, I don't think he was a CHL with the proper attitude.
If he is not a CHL, he wouldn't be covered under MPA either since a verbal threat from a homeless
guy might not be enough of a threat.
Whatever the interviewed man's status, talking about putting his .357 to someone's head seems like
a rather questionable action. Sheesh.
SIA
at a particular strip mall in NW San Antonio at the corner of <some street> and I-410.
The reporters interviewed a few people. One of them was a rough, country kind of guy.
He told the reporter, ON FILM, that an aggressive panhandler threatened to kick his ____
for not giving him any money.
The man said that he responded by putting a .357 to the forehead of the panhandler before
running him off. No shot was fired.
This could have been just a lying blusterer appearing tough.
If he had actually done this, I don't think he was a CHL with the proper attitude.
If he is not a CHL, he wouldn't be covered under MPA either since a verbal threat from a homeless
guy might not be enough of a threat.
Whatever the interviewed man's status, talking about putting his .357 to someone's head seems like
a rather questionable action. Sheesh.
SIA