Pacifist wrote:Perry is a seasoned politician, pure and simple, with obvious, admitted, and demonstrated aspirations towards bigger and better things than the "mere" governorship of this great state of ours, but who also has a very, very, very (did I mention very?) good team of advisors (many of whom are better at what they do than he is at what he does). As such, were he to add the Second-Amendment-friendly bills to this special session, he has been advised that he could be, and likely would be, very well providing additional ammunition to the 51% or so of the "more-gun-control" crowd among the U.S. general populace (and, more particularly, the 99.9% libtard media) to use at some point against him and, thus, hurting his attraction and electability on the National front.
Let's face it, even without calling any 2A bills during the special session, he, his pollsters, and his advisors know fully well that his reelection as Texas governor is virtually assured, so given the above, why chance it?
He is on the record for being a 2A supporter, for saying that we should be able to carry everywhere, for signing or not vetoing any pro-gun bill that had crossed his desk. So now you are implying that by not adding the pro-gun bills to the special session, the antis will see how a good guy he is and will fill up busses on the next election to go vote for him. The fact is, he will never get their vote, whether he adds these bills to the special session or not. He however, will lose votes from those who have supported and voted for him in the past. I know he will lose my vote.
I will support a politician that stands on principal. That is one of the reasons I voted for and support Ted Cruz. Now, if all you want as a politician is to continually be voted into office and will compromise your principals for a vote, I for one will not support you.
IMHO, Perry needs to put up or shut up. I don't want him giving speeches about how pro 2A he is, if he can't even support what he says he believes in. No one is proposing that he unilaterally declares abolishes 46.03 and 46.035 an allow CHL'ers to carry everywhere, even if he could. All we want is a chance for a vote of the full legislature on these bills. They have been held hostage the last few sessions by a few minority, even when the majority supports and would vote for them. "Maybe next session" is getting old.
