TexasCHLforum.com

mamabearCali wrote:I think choking dogs is already illegal. Public nakedness is as well....as I don't think he took off his clothes on the other sir of the fence.


What I want to know is what is up with people taking their clothes off then attacking people. Seems pretty counterintuitive to me. The naked attacks however seem to be happening with some frequency now.

As a side note some of you boys are headed for the woodshed....IME the mods here are pretty ticklish about any sort of innuendo no matter how tame.

The people also -- the abusers of bath salts also frequently and for some unknown reason take their clothes off and tear away at their body parts.

daveboyd wrote:

Oldgringo wrote:"...The intruder was hit once but continued to put up a fight..."

The homeowner was probably using one of them sissy .22's or a .380. If he'd used a manly .45 or perhaps a 20mm, there wouldn't be no more fight left in him...naked or not.

The linked article makes no mention of the caliber used by the victim. It doesn't even state whether it was a handgun or long gun. It only says that the attacker was shot in the foot. The victims problem wasn't the caliber of choice, of which we are assuming wasn't a .45, but was his marksmanship. I don't remember seeing many range targets awarding 10 points for a hit to the foot. If you're jacked up enough to attack a rottweiller while naked, a shot to the foot with with any caliber handgun isn't going to accomplish much.

"The person was naked, on the front porch choking his dog," said police spokeswoman Napier Velazquez. "That's when the resident shot him in the foot."