TexasCHLforum.com

tacticool wrote:

Bullwhip wrote:Reagan won big twice by playing up how conservative he was (maybe more than he really was). He got 44 states the first time and 49 states the second time, all while the media tore their hair out about how "right wing" he was.

Bingo! If the Republicans want to beat Obama, they need a candidate who is clearly different than Obama.

Yep!! The idea that you have to pander to anyone, especially moderates is infuriating.

Clearly state your beliefs and goals, and why your ideas are superior to your opponents. How hard is this?!

Barbi Q wrote:

loadedliberal wrote:Saying that no-taxes=no-vote is a slap in the face to our founders and the Constitution.

You mean the founders who only allowed males who owned property to vote?

Exactly. Before you start spouting about what the founders wanted, maybe you should learn what they did.

And you completely ignored my first statement. What country to you see us invading in the next 4 years?

v-rog wrote:Let me see...Vote Obama and keep Mr Holder or potentially get a Bachmann (or) Perry type candidate...and enter another war and commit another 100K of troops- I guess Iran would be next

Where are you imagining we're going to be deploying these troops? Not to mention where we are going to get them from. Military is stretched thin enough as it is.

But, if you want health care run like the DMV, unemployment to continue to rise, and a slow steady decline into economic irrelevancy for the USA, by all means vote Obama.