Search found 3 matches

by 74novaman
Thu Oct 07, 2010 4:52 pm
Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
Topic: 1911: Compact vs Full Size
Replies: 22
Views: 6036

Re: 1911: Compact vs Full Size

Sidro wrote:74Novaman now you need a 4" or 4.25" to have a full set. It's a vicious circle once you buy a 1911.
Quiet, you. "rlol"
by 74novaman
Thu Oct 07, 2010 3:16 pm
Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
Topic: 1911: Compact vs Full Size
Replies: 22
Views: 6036

Re: 1911: Compact vs Full Size

Well now that I have an actual opinion instead of just speculating, I'm resurrecting this thread from the dead.

I have owned and carried a 5 inch RIA 1911 in both OWB and IWB holsters and didn't have much trouble concealing it.

I just picked up a 3.5 inch RIA. Shorter barrel, and an officer frame.

I now get it. While it is doable to conceal the 5 inch (especially in cooler weather), it is much easier to conceal the compact. I think everyone should have one of each. :coolgleamA:

Since both of mine are steel, the weight difference between the two was pretty negligible. The 3.5 I bought did come with Hogue grips on it, and I like them so much I had to go ahead and order a set for my full size.

In summary, I now understand completely why people want both. :biggrinjester:
by 74novaman
Thu Aug 26, 2010 11:14 am
Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
Topic: 1911: Compact vs Full Size
Replies: 22
Views: 6036

1911: Compact vs Full Size

I currently own a Rock Island 1911A1 GI model. 5 inch, bare bones 1911. Love the gun.

It does make me wonder though: Whats the advantage of a 4 inch 1911? Does that extra inch really make it that much harder to carry a full size? For that matter, the compact models with smaller round counts confuse me too.

I don't seem to have any problems carrying my 5 inch 1911, so I was wondering why others had gone with the 3.5 or 4 inch versions. :tiphat:

Return to “1911: Compact vs Full Size”