I really like the Tomcat. I agree that they are "spendy" which is why I've never quite gotten around to acquiring one. One thing I'll say about inexpensive blowback pistols though--you do get what you pay for. The blowback models (.25, .32, some .380's) are sensitive to fit and finish, and are the key reason that "Saturday Night Specials" have such a bad history of functionality (Ravens, Jimminez Arms, some RG's, etc.)SewTexas wrote:
that right there is why I find the concept interesting. A lot of older women are starting to buy their first guns and are ending up being limited to revolvers because they can't operate a slide. I'm just thinking that a tip-up might be easier.
that Tomcat is cute, it's expensive! but it's cute!
yes, I do know that many are stopped and even killed with a .22
The older woman scenario (specifically my mother) is what started me hunting an easier to manage SA pistol. Fortunately, the removal of SA/NSA from the licensing has made that a non-issue for her now. She prefers (and always has) revolvers, and only cared about shooting a SA for her CHL/LTC. She didn't want to be "limited" especially since she just might want to grab whatever I'm carrying at the moment. She is the classic case of "Talk about .45's, shoot 9mm's and carry .38's" LOL
In truth, I've personally never felt like anyone was "undergunned" for self-defense with a good .38 special revolver with modern ammo.
And to bring this all the way back "on topic"
