The 30.06 is meaningless when carry is prohibited by statute and is still not valid because you wouldn't be charged for violating 30.06.mr1337 wrote:Gov can post 30.06 on property where carrying is prohibited by statute.jmra wrote:Given that a regular ISD is a government entity (property is government owned), a 30.06 sign would not be valid.howdy wrote:This is how I interpret the law. If someone posts a 30.06 sign at the entrance to a parking lot, it would not be binding to someone with a LTC, UNLESS that parking lot belongs to a school district, chemical plant, etc. If that big ugly sign is posted in the entrance to the School district lot, NO LTC person can have a gun in their car. What the Principal said was true since the parking lots are not posted. You on the other hand have received verbal notice and that makes it as binding as a sign. Most school districts have it in their employee handbooks that guns are not allowed on district property.
Maybe Keith or Charles will chime in.
Not to mention the fact that a school parking lot is not off limits by statute.