TexasCHLforum.com

anygunanywhere wrote:

jmra wrote:

cb1000rider wrote:

J.R.@A&M wrote: With respect, the GOP appointments are likely to be better than the democrat ones. Being a purist or protest voter in a general election is the worst thing to do. It will elect Hillary Clinton, who will appoint more SCOTUS justices.

GOP appointments over the last 30 years haven't worked out so well for a conservative agenda, if that's what you mean. Perhaps it could have been worse, but SCOTUS appears to be pretty middle/moderate even with the conservative appointees...

A lot better than the alternative - remember there have been a lot of 5-4 votes go our way on gun rights issues.

I believe that was before barry acquired the pics of Roberts doing whatever it was he was doing.

cb1000rider wrote:

J.R.@A&M wrote: With respect, the GOP appointments are likely to be better than the democrat ones. Being a purist or protest voter in a general election is the worst thing to do. It will elect Hillary Clinton, who will appoint more SCOTUS justices.

GOP appointments over the last 30 years haven't worked out so well for a conservative agenda, if that's what you mean. Perhaps it could have been worse, but SCOTUS appears to be pretty middle/moderate even with the conservative appointees...