C-dub wrote:I also saw that and it was the basis for posing this question on FB.
The problem, as I see it is that they have seen so many firearm cases in recent years and already ruled on the ability to regulate them that they won't want to even take up another case where they might be forced to invalidate any of their previous rulings. So, I think they will probably just ignore this and hope it goes away. Or, in the unlikely event they did take a case they would find some massively stupid reason to uphold their previous rulings.
I think the way this argument would sink or swim is in the lower courts. I believe the high court would refuse to revisit the gun issue and let a lower court decision stand.