TexasCHLforum.com

WinoVeritas wrote:

jmra wrote:

WinoVeritas wrote:I have both the 709 and 740. Great CC pistol IMO. No problems for 3 yrs. Nothing wrong with the trigger that a bit of practice won't resolve. Biggest strike against them is the lack of spare magazines for both Slims. If you get one, be sure it comes with two magazines - not so critical for carry, but handy for range time. I have nine mags for each Slim.

I have to disagree, no amount of practice resolves a horrible trigger. You may get use to a horrible trigger, but it doesn't make the trigger better.
Of course if you drink Mad Dog 20/20 long enough I guess you might develop a taste for it.

Not sure why the snarky response. In any case, I'm of the opinion the tool is not at fault, it's the user. You don't like the 709 trigger - I find no fault with it - so what?

WinoVeritas wrote:I have both the 709 and 740. Great CC pistol IMO. No problems for 3 yrs. Nothing wrong with the trigger that a bit of practice won't resolve. Biggest strike against them is the lack of spare magazines for both Slims. If you get one, be sure it comes with two magazines - not so critical for carry, but handy for range time. I have nine mags for each Slim.

Fishinmastr1 wrote:What was wrong with the trigger? I haven't got the chance to handle one. Just seen videos on YouTube. I was thinking about the baby glock gen 4 or the m&p sheild. I got my CHL 2 weeks ago.