Wouldn't taking a gun from a CHL during a "routine" traffic stop already prove him to be a doofus?Jumping Frog wrote:Jrma, if an officer wants to assert he needs to unload a holstered handgun for officer safety, either the holster is an unsafe piece of garbage or the officer is acting like a doofus.
Search found 5 matches
Return to “Police want to check your serial #”
- Sun Apr 13, 2014 2:02 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Police want to check your serial #
- Replies: 82
- Views: 14125
Re: Police want to check your serial #
- Sun Apr 13, 2014 7:02 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Police want to check your serial #
- Replies: 82
- Views: 14125
Re: Police want to check your serial #
Just speculating here, I know some have posted here that an officer returned their firearm unloaded. Could the officer claim that removing the weapon from the holster was necessary to unload the weapon (to ensure his safety)? If this claim was deemed valid, then of course the SN would be visible once he removed it from the holster.Jumping Frog wrote:Legally, he had the authority to disarm the CHL if he felt it was necessary for officer safety. If it is handed to him with the serial number in plain sight, then the plain sight exception applies.Dave2 wrote:Yeah, but it's only "in plain sight" because he or she forced you to put it in plain sight. Before the officer started telling you what to do, said gun was concealed and not in plain sight.
That was entirely the point I made earlier in this thread that sliding a paddle holster off the belt and handing over a holstered handgun is interesting, because now the serial number is not in plain sight and the plain sight exception does not apply.
- Tue Apr 08, 2014 11:02 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Police want to check your serial #
- Replies: 82
- Views: 14125
Re: Police want to check your serial #
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boiling_frogDragonfighter wrote:I had a girl coming over for supper one time when I was in school. I salted up some water, tossed a couple of lobsters in it and went off to shower and shave. When I came back to check, the pot was empty. I found one when I saw a canister moving on the cabinet. The other was a little more difficult but he (she?) had worked into the space between the cabinet and fridge. So yes, starting with cool water and start increasing the heat, they'll leave. But you toss their happy selves back in when the water is boiling, they're not going anywhere.Carzan wrote:C-dub wrote:And it sounds like your science classes in school were a bit different than mine. Either that or, do your parents know what was really going on out in their garage?Carzan wrote:Put a frog into a pot of boiling water he will jump out immediately. However, put a frog into a pot of room temp water and slowly heat it up and he will sit there until its too late and the heat has overcome him.
The government is taking the second approach.
Actually, I don't even know if it's true. I heard that somewhere and it makes a really good analogy for this discussion. I bet the frog actually jumps out in each scenario.
My experience with cooking frogs is limited in that I have never cooked an intact and extant frog. But if I did I s'pect the experience might be similar.
FWIW, the boiling frog metaphor is just another iteration of the non sequitor fallacy.
Maybe a metaphor likening it to cancer, by the time you see the symptoms it may be too late.
The boiling frog story is a widespread anecdote describing a frog slowly being boiled alive. The premise is that if a frog is placed in boiling water, it will jump out, but if it is placed in cold water that is slowly heated, it will not perceive the danger and will be cooked to death. The story is often used as a metaphor for the inability or unwillingness of people to react to significant changes that occur gradually.[1] According to contemporary biologists the premise of the story is not literally true; a frog submerged and gradually heated will jump out.[2][3] However, some 19th-century experiments suggested that the underlying premise is true, provided the heating is sufficiently gradual.[4][5]
- Mon Apr 07, 2014 9:57 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Police want to check your serial #
- Replies: 82
- Views: 14125
Re: Police want to check your serial #
Ask jumpingfrog.Carzan wrote:C-dub wrote:And it sounds like your science classes in school were a bit different than mine. Either that or, do your parents know what was really going on out in their garage?Carzan wrote:Put a frog into a pot of boiling water he will jump out immediately. However, put a frog into a pot of room temp water and slowly heat it up and he will sit there until its too late and the heat has overcome him.
The government is taking the second approach.
Actually, I don't even know if it's true. I heard that somewhere and it makes a really good analogy for this discussion. I bet the frog actually jumps out in each scenario.
- Mon Apr 07, 2014 10:04 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Police want to check your serial #
- Replies: 82
- Views: 14125
Re: Police want to check your serial #
6 pages on this topic here:
viewtopic.php?f=125&t=59850&hilit=Polic ... al+numbers
14 pages here:
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=59844&start=195
viewtopic.php?f=125&t=59850&hilit=Polic ... al+numbers
14 pages here:
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=59844&start=195